Because Process Matters

Q&A Series: The Evolution of EA

Posted by: Sandra Moran on: January 27, 2012

Next up in my Q&A series on EA, I am going to address how the EA market is changing and what vendors are doing to support user’s new expectations.

Question: What are some of the ways that EA is evolving and what changes are EA tool vendors implementing to support those changes?

Continue reading this post »

Q&A Series: The Future of EA and BPA

Posted by: Sandra Moran on: January 25, 2012

Today I’m continuing my Q&A series on frequent questions asked about enterprise architecture and business process analysis tools. Over the past few months there has been a lot of chatter around the future of EA and BPA. Here’s another installment on the future of this market and the best way to leverage these tools to drive positive change in your organization.

Question: Where do you think this market is going? Do you see other tools coming into play?

Continue reading this post »

Q&A Series: The Value of EA and BPA

Posted by: Sandra Moran on: January 23, 2012

In November and December, Gartner released the Magic Quadrants for Enterprise Architecture (EA) and Business Process Analysis (BPA) respectively.  We thought we’d discuss some of Gartner’s observations about trends in both EA and BPA along with many questions we’ve heard from our customers and prospects over the years.  We are thrilled about our leadership positions in both of these reports; however, I can’t help but think that many of our customers who use our tools could be getting far more from their EA investments. While EA and BPA tools are maturing it seems like many decision makers in large organizations don’t have a clear, holistic understanding about the value they can bring to the table. Over the next few days I’ll be taking a deep dive into some of the most popular questions organizations have about EA and BPA.

Question: What sort of value do organizations achieve from Enterprise Architecture?

Continue reading this post »

Cliché as it may be, I can’t stop myself from turning the page on the calendar of a new year and turning my mind to my personal goals for the year. Naturally, many organizations have a tendency to follow suit.  Bolstered by this spirit of the possible,  organizations begin to envision themselves achieving their goals – to rethink the way their business operates with renewed desire to drive innovation, increase speed to market and dramatically improve customer service.

To bring life to those enterprise aspirations, business and technology leaders should look to 2012 as a year to continue improving their collaborative efforts to achieve business change. There are no indications that the new year will bring any relief from the increasing pace of technology and business change, nor the increasing demands from more educated and socially connected customers. 2011 continued the trend toward business driving IT and 2012 offers the opportunity to make this shift pay off for organizations. Many organizations who are focused on bridging the gap between business and IT groups will achieve far more benefits if they fuse these two groups  into business teams working collaboratively to drive transformations.

Continue reading this post »

Have you seen the movie Real Steel? In the storyline of this flick, automation has replaced human fighters with 2000-pound, 8-foot-tall steel robot boxers. The moral is “humans out, automation in” — end of story, right? Not exactly. As it turns out, it’s the right combination of human and machine that proves necessary for the win. Sounds a lot like business process improvement to me.

How does this notion of human and machine translate to success in the business world? Legendary fighter and advisor to the movie Sugar Ray Leonard tells us that we are actually seeing a story about relationships in Real Steel. That is, the importance of the relationship between Hugh Jackman, the ex-boxer now “corner man” and Atom, his robot fighter. It is that enabling (some might say co-dependent) relationship that leads to their success. Herein lies the lesson learned for business — while automation is required, it is not sufficient for success. I have seen that hold true in my world of business process solutions where adaptive case management and knowledge workers team up to drive productivity.

Continue reading this post »

When It Comes to Mobile Apps – Thin is In!

Posted by: Kevin Haugh on: December 20, 2011

One of the big topics of discussion regarding mobile is whether the mobile app market is moving towards native apps that are OS/device specific, or whether it is moving towards device neutral platforms such as HTML5. Today the mobile market is marked by a combination of native apps, device neutral apps and hybrid apps which fall somewhere in between. One of the big drivers for native apps has been the richer user experience and capability possible through such apps. Mobile operating systems have allowed applications to access lower level features available in mobile devices such as the camera, GPS and local data storage. It is these very features, not historically supported through device independent platform such as HTML, that have brought some of the most compelling capabilities to mobile devices and the market. But the down side to native apps is that it has made it much more difficult to build and deploy apps broadly since doing so has required separate apps to be built to run on each environment.

In an effort to achieve some of the best of both worlds hybrid approaches have been developed which wrap applications designed to be largely OS independent with code designed to provide access to the lower level device features and capability. A number of vendors including OpenText have developed mobile frameworks to facilitate the creation of such hybrid apps. See for example the Mobile Wave Platform.

Continue reading this post »

RSS Email Subscription